“I’m not a racist. I just don’t believe in mixing the races that way,” Bardwell told the Associated Press on Thursday. “I have piles and piles of black friends. They come to my home, I marry them, they use my bathroom. I treat them just like everyone else.”

And yet this Justice of the Peace will not sign the marriage license of mixed race couples.  And it’s for the children.  Those poor mixed race children never grown up to be anything significant.  Why they’ll be forced to spend their lives reading other people’s words off of teleprompters and accepting meaningless medals from Norwegians.  How terrible for them.

This must be another example of the horrible right wing Republican racists right?  Indeed, he is listed as a Republican in the Louisiana Parish Elected Officials listing.  But something interesting happens when you click on the link to see his office incumbent history.

That’s unpossible!  What possibly could have happened in 2008 that made him change parties?  You don’t think it’s because of racism do ya?  Of course not.  Democrats are all so very enlightened and accepting!  His denial of this marriage application was certainly due to the evil influence of his new party affiliation. Or, maybe not.

Evidently, Bardwell has long had a policy of not marrying interracial couples, and admitted that Louisiana’s attorney general had warned him years ago that he could “get into trouble” because of it.

“I told him if I do, I’ll resign,” Bardwell told the Daily Star. “I have rights too. I’m not obligated to do that just because I’m a justice of the peace.”

Or maybe the party of Robert Byrd, former Exalted Cyclops of the KKK, is a little less enlightened than they would like us to believe.  At least they are equal opportunity haters.  They say vile, childish things about women too.  But what do you expect from someone that thinks Twitter is a person.  Guess he’s really using that “ivy league” education.

Just look at all these mean racist doctors demonstrating against Dear Reader’s brilliant plan to take over the world every aspect of your life health-care. Yeah, 2/3rds of practicing physicians are opposed to Obamacare racist.  45% would consider quitting if Obamacare passed because they really hate black people that much.

Waiving that finger.

Of course they don’t really care about patients.  They’re just racist according to Jimmah Carter.  You remember him right?  Nice peanut farmer guy that was in way over his head as president.  Then decided to get all buddy buddy with people that want us dead.  I think he realized that his place in history as the worst president evah may not be so secure.  Now he’s got to be the worst ex-president evah.

Democratic Senator Jay Rockefeller is opposed to the bill on the basis of it raising taxes on the middle class because he’s racist.  The CEO of Coca-Cola is racist too.  And not just because he didn’t redesign the company logo in honor of Dear Reader like some other soft drink companies we know.  Nope.  It’s because he is opposed to turning the US into the old Soviet Union.

Coca-Cola Co. Chairman and Chief Executive Officer Muhtar Kent said the idea of a federal tax on soft drinks, under consideration by the U.S. Congress and President Barack Obama, is “outrageous.”

“I have never seen it work where a government tells people what to eat and what to drink,” Kent said today, responding to an audience question at the Rotary Club of Atlanta. “If it worked, the Soviet Union would still be around.”

Yep.  The word racist has no officially taken on a new meaning.  It is no longer hateful discrimination based on a person’s race.  It is now any and all disagreement with Dear Reader.

You knew it was coming, if you oppose the president addressing your children without you, you’re racist.  You know, it would have nothing to due with the fact you might have a problem with who he considers great mentors.  Or maybe it’s because he hangs out with Truthers.

Fine.  Make that accusation.  I’ve actually come to welcome it.  Why?  Because I know that when you sink to just calling those that oppose you racists, you don’t really have an argument.  You may as well be doing the I’m rubber, you’re glue playground chant.

Racism was once thought of like a cardinal sin.  Now the word is thrown around so much that its meaning has been cheapened and lost.  It is nothing more that a political tool.  When the left can no longer answer logical opposition, they must sink to character assassination.

Cries of racism have become the default setting.  I’d hate to take that away from them.  Really, it’s all they’ve got.

Being called a racist by socialist bastard.  If Fidel Castro is making the argument, it is officially dead. Also, I’m all for opposing any kind of change that Fidel Castro considers positive.

President Barack Obama is trying to make positive changes in the United States, but is being fought at every turn by right-wingers who hate him because he is black, former Cuban leader Fidel Castro said on Tuesday.

So says the guy that turned Cuba into a socialist hell hole.  You don’t see a lot of Floridians trying to make their cars sea worthy so they can get to Cuba.

I’m actually kind of tickled that so many “journalists” in main stream media can’t see the irony of making the unfounded, far-reaching, stereotypical pronouncement about a group of people that are different from them.  Apparently we are incapable of judging the current administration by the content of their legislation. And what does it mean that when they look out at a tea party crowd they just see white people?

I tried being racist once, but I’m such a mutt that I’d just have to hate myself.

So everyone is talking about the man that carried a scary black rifle to the Dear Reader event in Arizona.  Sebastian has a great round-up of reactions.  Personally, I’m of 2 minds on this one.  On the one hand, if the press keeps reporting on all of these people carrying scary guns in public and no violence occurs, we gain ground in the image battle.  On the other hand, the last thing we want to do is get people excited about pushing gun control.  We have to be careful when pushing the fence sitters.  They may fall on the wrong side of the fence.  Don’t assume that I am saying we shouldn’t push, we should just be careful about how we do it.

And hey, I’d love the overwhelming reaction to the man with a gun stories to be something along the lines of, “And?  So what.”  It’s not the presence of a gun that causes crime; it’s the presence of a criminal.

But  found something else very interesting, the same press that is dislocating their arms patting themselves on the back for electing the first black president, didn’t mention the race of the gun-toting citizen in Arizona.  In fact, I was discussing this very story with my husband last night and he had not yet heard that it was a black man.  I find that an interesting omission when those of us opposed to Dear Reader and his intentions are painted as racists.

AP Photo

I suppose the race card only comes out of the deck when it supports the narrative.  And judging from the gun on his belt, he’s also a lefty.

It is interesting where the media does and does not feel that a person’s race is notable.  It’s almost like they want us to believe that all minorities march lock-step on the left side of the aisle.  It’s notable that our black president nominated a Hispanic woman to the Supreme Court.  Not notable when one of the ‘racists’ that is demonstrating in opposition to Dear Reader just so happens to be black.  Gotcha.

Update:  Sailorcurt noticed too

Breda too.

I’ll keep adding links as I see more posts

Traction Control

Sebastian

Tam

Sister Toldjah

Hot Air

Ace Complete with contact information for NBC.  Nice.

Says Uncle

Lissa

Stop the ACLU

War on Guns

Right Wing Nut House

Moonbattery

MSNBC’s actions are reprehensible.  They cut their footage to make it fit the racist narrative.  It’s blatant spin.  No, it’s worse than spin.  They didn’t spin it; they faked it.

Old media is officially dead.  The stink of the reanimated rotting corpse of journalism has reached the break point.

I would hope that a wise Latina woman with the richness of her experience would more often than not reach a better conclusion than a white male who hasn’t lived that life.

Yeah, you’ve heard that. Sonia Sotomayor said it at Berkeley.  Yes, she’s racist.  Newsflash kiddies, people that aren’t white can be racist too. I have to wonder how heavy her heart will sit if and when she takes this oath.

Each justice or judge of the United States shall take the following oath or affirmation before performing the duties of his office: “I, XXX XXX, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will administer justice without respect to persons, and do equal right to the poor and to the rich, and that I will faithfully and impartially discharge and perform all the duties incumbent upon me as XXX under the Constitution and laws of the United States. So help me God.”

She’s a flaming liberal that doesn’t possess the depth of knowledge needed for the position she has been nominated.  And even though the White House press secretary warns us to “be careful” in describing her, calling her such is completely warranted.

She ignored what could have been a definitive case on the application of affirmative action. She dismissed a suit filed by 18 white firefighters with only a paragraph of reasoning.

We affirm, for the reasons stated in the thorough, thoughtful, and well-reasoned opinion
of the court below. Ricci v. DeStefano, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 73277, 2006 WL 2828419 (D.
Conn., Sept. 28, 2006). In this case, the Civil Service Board found itself in the unfortunate
position of having no good alternatives. We are not unsympathetic to the plaintiffs’ expression
of frustration. Mr. Ricci, for example, who is dyslexic, made intensive efforts that appear to have
resulted in his scoring highly on one of the exams, only to have it invalidated. But it simply does
not follow that he has a viable Title VII claim. To the contrary, because the Board, in refusing to
validate the exams, was simply trying to fulfill its obligations under Title VII when confronted
with test results that had a disproportionate racial impact, its actions were protected.

A test was given to the firefighters to determine which of them would receive a promotion.  This was deemed fair by the fire department in order to give it to the most qualified, regardless of race.  At least, it was fair until they saw that it was the white males that excelled at the test.  Oops!  So they threw out the test so they can lower the standards.  Forget rewarding hard work!

This is exactly the kind of damage that affirmative action does.  The intent was to prevent people from being discriminated against due to the color of their skin.  Instead, it does exactly that.  Affirmative Action just chooses which skin colors will be advantaged and disadvantaged.  By lowering the standards for a group of people, you lower the quality of work of all.

Why should I jump for the high bar when I get the same number of points for hopping the low one?  If at the top of 1000 steps there is a man that will give you 1000 gold bars, would you climb the steps?  What if there was an elevator?  Or, as in the case of affirmative action, what if someone was standing only 100 steps up that was breaking the knees of those that were coming back from the top so they could give the gold bars to someone underprivileged?  Where then is the incentive to climb to the top?  Would you study night and day with audio recordings to overcome a reading disability?

But apparently non-white skin means more to Sotomayor than diligence and hard work.  But she is not a surprise pick from Dear Reader, the affirmative action president.  She’s also being nominated to fill the seat of Souter, another liberal justice.  If confirmed, she will not change the balance of the court.

In the end, it’s a wash.  Is her nomination just a sign of things to come?  Maybe.  I find it interesting though that he chose someone so definitely liberal, so absolutely chosen out of identity politics for his first pick.  Is he thinking that Congress may not be so willing to bend to his will at his next opportunity?  Maybe he thinks the red/blue balance will be different after the next Congressional election.  2010 is not that far away, and the next justice likely to step down (Ruth Bader Ginsburg) is another of the left side of the political spectrum.